By Chandni Kazi and Claire Hastwell.
Pre-pandemic, only 5% of American employees worked from home. In May 2020, that number shot up to over 60%. Our own survey of Fortune 500 executives shows a similar increase, from 16% to 65% of staff working virtually.
This massive shift has stirred up questions about the future of work and most notably, about remote work productivity.
Working from home is just as productive as working in the office – possibly more so. A two-year study by Great Place to Work® of more than 800,000 employees at Fortune 500 companies found that most people reported stable or even increased productivity levels after employees started working from home.
To assess the productivity of working remote, we surveyed 715 companies, representing over 3 million U.S. employees. We analyzed over 800,000 responses and measured productivity using survey statements that examined the degree to which:
The percent positives capture the percentage of people who responded “often true” or “almost always true” to both statements.
We measured employee productivity from March to August of 2020 – the first six months of stay-at-home orders – and compared it to the same six-month period in 2019. Results showed productivity had improved while working from home (see graph).
With daily commutes and lengthy in-person meetings eliminated, employees likely found they were able to get more done. However, the biggest impact on remote work productivity came from the same factors that influence in-person productivity: company culture and leadership.
In the productivity study, we ran a comment analysis of employee survey responses to the open-ended question, “Is there anything unique or unusual about this company that makes it a great place to work?”
Interestingly, the most common phrase among people experiencing high productivity changed over time. In March-May the most common phrase was “catered lunches at home,” indicating the power of perks for increasing employee wellbeing and productivity.
However, in June to August, the most common phrase was “genuinely love.” Examples of these comments include:
From September to December, “positive atmosphere” was the most used phrase by employees to describe what makes their company a great place to work.
While perks may have bolstered employee productivity through the early months of working from home, it was camaraderie and positive culture that influenced longer-term productivity.
“Camaraderie is like a secret weapon. When employees experience the nexus of great work, a powerful mission, and shared values, productivity soars,” explained Julian Lute, Great Place to Work strategic advisor.
“Employees in great workplaces believe their co-workers see them as whole people, with family, hobbies, and passions that they bring to work each day. When relationships are strong, employees feel energized and bring their skills to the table to collaborate on organizational goals.”
Other unique phrases among employees who worked productively from home were about leadership:
Such comments reveal how much impact leadership can have on employee productivity. And in the midst of the pandemic and all its uncertainty, the power of great leadership was on full display.
“When times are tough, leaders have the greatest opportunity to build trust. Their ability to navigate the complexities of the business, communicate effectively, and bring people along is more visible,” said Julian.
“Consistent communication and supporting people in shifting work arrangements, all while taking care of customers, is a balancing act. But leaders who are vulnerable help employees to experience the workplace as supportive and caring.”
Despite the initial increase, productivity fell in the summer, declining sharply from May to August by 11 percentage points (see graph).
However, by September, productivity began to pick up slightly, rising to 80% in December 2020 from its lowest point of 76% in August.
Employees who dipped in summer may have had a spring of “toxic productivity” – an unhealthy compulsion to work, perhaps out of fear of layoff or a loss of work/life balance amid lockdown. And toxic productivity almost always comes from the top.
Between June and August – the least productive months – the comment “Hire leaders” was most repeated by unproductive employees under survey questions about what could make the workplace better.
For example:
“Employees expect their leaders to lead, make decisions and support their work,” said Julian.
“Leaders who do not prioritize trust contribute to uncertainty, inconsistent communication, and lack of collaboration during challenging times. People expect their leaders to be guides and help them understand the broader business environment.”
Read more about the importance of trustworthy managers during a crisis.
The Best Workplaces™ saw a return to healthy productivity levels in December. These companies kept tabs on their employees’ needs with pulse surveys throughout the pandemic, giving them insight into how to preserve employee well-being.
“After sustaining higher than usual productivity, we all had to find a ‘normal’ that was sustainable,” explained Laurie Minott, Great Place to Work senior strategic advisor and partner.
“Supportive workplaces were recognizing this around the time of the decline and doubling down on self-care, balance and support for parents with kids at home.”
Productivity of both in-person and remote work are influenced by the same key factors: leadership and healthy, supportive company culture. Workplaces that are strong in both can have high employee productivity no matter where their desks may be.
Check in on your employees with our pulse survey – it measures care, collaboration, equity, engagement and 25 other measures of employee experience. Get a demo and see how our survey can help your employee experience today.
© Great Place to Work® Institute. All Rights Reserved.
ABOUT OUR METHOLOGY
To be eligible for the World’s Best Workplaces list, a company must apply and be named to a minimum of 5 national Best Workplaces lists within our current 58 countries, have 5,000 employees or more worldwide, and at least 40% of the company’s workforce (or 5,000 employees) must be based outside of the home country. Extra points are given based on the number of countries where a company surveys employees with the Great Place to Work Trust Index©, and the percentage of a company’s workforce represented by all Great Place to Work surveys globally. Candidates for the 2017 Worlds Best Workplaces list will have appeared on national workplaces lists published in September 2016 through August 2017.
ABOUT OUR METHOLOGY
The Best Workplaces in Asia List
Great Place to Work® identifies the top organizations that create great workplaces in the Asian and Middle Eastern regions with the publication of the annual Best Workplaces in Asia list. The list recognizes companies in three size categories:
To be considered for inclusion, companies must appear on one or more of our national lists in the region, which includes Greater China (covering China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau), India, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka and UAE. For the 2021 Asia List, companies ranked on the national list in the Philippines will also be included. Multinational organizations must meet the following requirements:
Multinationals also receive additional credit for their efforts to successfully create an excellent workplace culture in multiple countries in the region. The data used in the calculation of the regional list comes from national lists published in 2019 and early 2020.
